The Silent Noise · Issue 05 ·

Your Sales Team Is Working Harder. Is Your Go-to-Market Keeping Up?

Your sales team is making more calls and sending more proposals than last year. The revenue line has not moved. If that sounds familiar, effort may not be the issue. Look at the plan your team is working inside.

This issue looks at what buyers now do before they ever speak to your team, why deals stall even after a buyer has said yes, and what Indian founders and boards can check this quarter. Every number has a dated source at the bottom.

By Gaurav Bhatnagar, Independent GTM & Growth Consultant · Sources checked 25 October 2026
  About 10 minutes to read.

Four questions to test your go-to-market

  1. Is your target customer narrow and named?
  2. Does the buyer learn something useful about you before they speak to your team?
  3. Can your team say in one line why a buyer should act now?
  4. Do you know how long a deal takes, and where it usually gets stuck?
If you cannot answer two of these, start here
Jump to Global India Side by side Ten-minute check First 30 days FAQ

If you read nothing else

Start here

Three situations you may know

1

The sales team is making more calls and sending more proposals than last year. The revenue line is flat.

2

A pilot went well. The customer said good things. Then nothing happened for months.

3

Funds came in, a sales head was hired, and the board still asks why growth is slow.

These look like sales problems. Most of the time they are not. They are go-to-market problems, and more effort on the sales side does not fix them.

What is go-to-market?

Go-to-market is your plan for who you sell to, what you tell them, how they find you, and how a deal moves from the first conversation to a signature. If that plan is weak, a harder-working sales team only reaches the wrong answer faster.
Global Signal

Global: buyers now decide before they talk to you

Gartner surveyed 646 B2B buyers in August and September 2025 and published the results on 9 March 2026.

67%
of B2B buyers say they prefer a rep-free buying experience
Gartner, 9 March 2026
45%
reported using AI during a recent purchase
Gartner, 9 March 2026
2x
Buyers who felt confident in their decision were twice as likely to report a high-quality deal
Gartner, 9 March 2026

Simply put, the buyer has done their homework by the time your rep arrives. If your website, your content and your proof do not answer their questions, your rep starts from behind.

The research is moving to AI tools too. G2's 2026 report says eight out of ten buyers now use AI search to be more efficient in buying. Visionary Marketing's survey of 900 buyers (April 2026) puts it at 67% using ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini or Claude during research, up from 23% in 2024. My reading: if an AI tool cannot find your company and describe it clearly, you may not reach the shortlist at all.

Gartner's May 2026 release, from the same survey period, found that 69% of buyers prefer to check AI-generated insights with a sales rep. So buyers use AI to research, and then want a person to confirm. That changes the rep's job. It is now about helping them decide, and less about introducing the product.

The cost side is moving too

Benchmarkit's 2025 report covers 563 SaaS companies, with 2024 data, and was published in June 2025.

26%
median growth, nine points below plan
$2.00
new-customer CAC ratio in 2024, up from $1.76
101%
median net revenue retention
40%
of new revenue now from existing customers, up from 25% in 2022

Benchmarkit 2025 SaaS Performance Metrics Benchmarks Report, via SaaS Barometer, June 2025.

The new-customer CAC ratio is what a company spends on sales and marketing to win a dollar of new customer revenue. So winning a customer costs more than it did, and plans written on last year's numbers miss. Hiring more salespeople will not bring that cost down. A sharper plan can. Growth is also leaning more on customers you already have.

Where the deal dies, even after the yes

A 2026 study by Visionary Marketing of 184 of its own B2B client deals found an average of 14.4 people involved in a net-new deal of $100,000 to $500,000. That is one agency's data, weighted towards agency-supported accounts, so take it as a signal, not a rule.

G2's 2026 Buyer Behavior Report surveyed 1,038 B2B decision-makers in June 2026. 39% said IT security review is the single biggest source of delay between selecting a vendor and completing the purchase. Among enterprise buyers it was 50%. Budget approval came next at 32%. Money decisions come late too. 49% said their CFO had reversed a purchase that the buying team had already approved in the last 12 months. Finance involvement in software decisions rose from 31% to 46% in one year. So a deal is not closed when the champion says yes.

LinkedIn, citing research with Bain, says 40% of deals stall because the buying group cannot agree, and that finance, legal and procurement hold about half of the decision influence. The page I read does not give the sample size or method, so treat it as a pointer, not an exact count.

Inside the committee, Visionary's data shows where deals are won or lost. Deals with an active detractor, someone on the buying side who opposes the purchase, closed at 17%. Deals with no detractor closed at 41%. Where a security or finance veto-holder was brought in early, the win rate was 44%. Where that person was found late, it was 19%. Only 32% of vendor sales teams said they map detractors in a systematic way. Security review alone added 27 days to the cycle on average. Visionary also found that 87% of buyers want pricing visible before they contact sales, up from 64% in 2022.

Win rate by what the vendor did
No detractor in the buying group
41%
Active detractor present
17%
Security or finance veto-holder engaged early
44%
Veto-holder found late in the cycle
19%
Full pricing shown
38%
No pricing shown
14%

Visionary Marketing, B2B buying committee statistics, April 2026 (184 client deals plus a survey of 900 buyers and 900 sellers). One agency's data, so a pointer and not a benchmark.

What to fix

  1. Make the buyer's own research easy. Clear pages for each use, real proof, and straight answers to the questions they would ask a rep.
  2. Change what the rep does. Spend less time introducing the product and more time helping the buyer decide.
  3. Plan for several people in the room. Each person who signs off needs a reason that matters to them.
  4. Check the cost of winning a customer against your plan every quarter, not once a year.
  5. Keep your security answers, legal terms and references ready before the buyer asks, and speak to finance, legal and procurement early, not at the end.
India Signal

India: the interest is there, the deal still does not move

Growth is happening in Indian tech. Inc42's FY26 tracker, published on 24 October 2026, covers 106 new-age tech companies.

₹4.89 lakh crore
operating revenue in FY26, up 33.17% from ₹3.67 lakh crore in FY25
Inc42, 24 October 2026
66 of 106
companies reported a profit in FY26
Inc42, 24 October 2026
40
companies made a loss in FY26
Inc42, 24 October 2026

Revenue is growing, yet 40 of the 106 companies still made a loss.

What I could not find. I looked for a survey with a sales-cycle number for Indian B2B companies and did not find one, so I am not giving one. If you have seen a solid one, write to me and I will add it with credit.

What I can share is a practitioner's view on selling to US enterprises from India (GTM Unbound, read on 25 October 2026). It is not research, but the problems it lists are the ones founders talk about:

If you run a profitable business that has been going for ten years or more, the picture is a little different. The first customers usually came through people you knew. That route has a ceiling, and growth flattens when you reach it. This is my view and not a survey finding.

What to fix

  1. Write every pilot like a small contract: what is in scope, what success means, by what date, and what happens if it works.
  2. Choose 50 to 100 accounts that fit you well, and decide who owns each one.
  3. Bring legal, security and procurement into the conversation early, not at the end.
  4. Note the date of the last real movement in each deal. A deal quiet for a month needs a plan and an owner.
  5. If you are bootstrapped, write down where your last ten customers came from. If most came through people you knew, the next ten need a different route.
Global and India

Global vs India: go-to-market side by side

Global versus India: go-to-market comparison
ParameterGlobalIndia
What is changingBuyers research alone and use AI before they speak to a repDeals stall without warning, and several reviews run beside the sales talks
EvidenceGartner, Aug to Sep 2025 survey: 67% prefer rep-free, 45% used AI, 69% check AI findings with a repA practitioner write-up (GTM Unbound, read 25 Oct 2026). No survey figure found
Cost signalBenchmarkit, 563 companies, 2024 data: new-customer CAC ratio $2.00, up from $1.76No sourced Indian figure found
Where it goes wrongThe rep arrives late, and 40% of deals stall because the buying group cannot agree (LinkedIn, citing Bain)Pilots without scope, and too many target accounts
Fix firstMake the buyer's own research easyNarrow the account list and write each pilot as a small contract
Do this today

A ten-minute go-to-market check

Tick the questions you can answer today, clearly, without asking anyone. The ones you cannot tick are where to look first.

For the founder

7 questions
0 of 7 ticked.

For the board member or investor

5 questions
0 of 5 ticked.
What to do next

Fix your go-to-market in the first 30 days

Week 1

List your last ten customers and your last five stalled or lost deals. Note where each came from and where each got stuck.

Week 2

Cut the target list down to named accounts that fit, with an owner for each.

Week 3

Rewrite your pilot terms, and fix the pages a buyer reads before they talk to anyone.

Week 4

Fix three numbers to track every quarter, and decide who reports them.

How I work

A second pair of eyes on your go-to-market

I have spent 24 years in marketing and growth for B2B companies, and I have advised more than 20 founders on go-to-market. My way of working is simple. I come in, find what is actually stuck, fix it with your team, and hand it over so that you do not need me.

FAQ

Go-to-market questions founders ask

It is your plan for who you sell to, what you tell them, how they find you, and how a deal moves from the first conversation to a signature. Sales is one part of it. If the plan is weak, a harder-working sales team only gets to the wrong answer faster.
Money lets you hire and spend, but it cannot fix a vague target customer or a slow deal process. If those are unclear, extra spend adds cost without adding revenue. Benchmarkit's 2025 report on 563 SaaS companies found median growth of 26%, nine points below plan, while the cost of winning a new customer rose.
Use the ten-minute check in this issue. If you cannot answer the questions on target customer, deal time and stalled deals, start there. A good sign is that you can say where your last ten customers came from, how long your last five deals took, and which deal has been quiet the longest.
Gartner found that 67% of B2B buyers prefer a rep-free buying experience (646 buyers, August to September 2025). A second Gartner release in May 2026 found that 69% prefer to check AI-generated insights with a sales rep. I think buyers want to talk when they are ready, with their basic questions already answered.
G2's 2026 Buyer Behavior Report (1,038 decision-makers, June 2026) says 39% name IT security review as the biggest source of delay between choosing a vendor and completing the purchase, and 49% say their CFO reversed an already approved purchase in the last 12 months. The fix is to keep security answers, legal terms and references ready, and to speak to finance, legal and procurement early.
Benchmarkit's 2025 report found a median new-customer CAC ratio of $2.00 for 2024, up from $1.76 in 2023. That means a typical company spent $2.00 on sales and marketing to win $1.00 of new customer revenue. Use it as a reference point and not as a target. What matters more is whether your own ratio is moving the wrong way against your plan.
Not by itself. A long cycle you understand and plan for is fine. A long cycle you cannot explain is the problem. If you cannot say where deals usually get stuck, you cannot plan around it.
In my view, when the way they sell can be written down and a second person has closed a deal using it. Until then, the sales process lives in the founder's head, and it leaves when they do.

Related reading

Think of the deal that has been quiet the longest. Is there someone in that buying group you have never spoken to? Start with that person. A bigger sales team will not reach them for you.

Sources

Before You Go

What's Your Take?

That's Issue 05.

If this matches a stalled deal you have actually lived through, or if it does not, I would like to know. Just a straight line to my inbox.